TCAT Election Survey Logo 
Ward 18 - Davenport Candidates

Survey Posted:
Adam Giambrone
Jim Rawling


Not Returned:
Nha Le
Jim McMillan
Simon Wookey


Not Sent:
Lloyd Ferguson

Other Wards

Candidate: Jim Rawling
Office: councillor
Ward: 18 - Davenport
Campaign Phone: 416 531-5693
Website:
Email: jimrabbit@sympatico.ca

Survey Results

Active Transportation

1. Increasing the role of walking and cycling in Toronto

Walking and cycling (Active Transportation) are the most affordable, healthy and sustainable forms of transportation. In order to seriously tackle the problems of smog, local greenhouse gas emissions, increasing traffic congestion and volatile gas prices, Toronto City Council needs to actively support programs and infrastructure changes that encourage walking and cycling.

Do you support increasing the role of walking and cycling in Toronto’s transportation system through improved programs and infrastructure?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: The current council is not encouraging these initiatives. Projects such as the Front St. extension and straightening the Dufferin Street jog are costing millions and are targeted to the facilitate automobile traffic. I understand the 2006 allocation for the bike program wasn’t even all spent, and the objectives not achieved.
 

2. Integrating cycling and pedestrian issues into city planning: road reconstruction & resurfacing

The most cost effective way of building bike lanes and adding pedestrian friendly features to roads is to do it when roads are reconstructed or resurfaced. Toronto spends millions of dollars every year reconstructing and resurfacing roads and most of these are done without making changes to the cycling and pedestrian environment. This is a missed opportunity. Every road reconstruction and resurfacing project and new road construction should incorporate design features that will improve conditions for cyclists and pedestrians.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Integrate - Road Reconstruction

Do you support a new process that will review road reconstruction and resurfacing projects, as well as development plans, to ensure that they include improvements to the active transportation infrastructure?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: roads in general in Toronto are in the poorest condition I have ever seen, with massive potholes capable of destroying your bike should you be unfortunate enough to hit one. Bad enough to have to dodge increasing amounts of traffic in the smog, at the same time you have to watch the road like a hawk to avoid hitting a pothole
 

3. Increasing the use of cycling and walking to conduct city business

As the City of Toronto calls on its residents to make the transition to Active Transportation it should lead by example by incorporating cycling and walking into the delivery of its services. It could do this by: a) having more staff use bikes in the course of their duties such as bylaw officers, parking enforcement officers, police and other city employees b) using more bicycle and foot couriers c) improving bicycle parking facilities at city buildings to encourage staff to bike to work and residents to bike to access city programs and services.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Lead - Increase the use of cycling and walking to conduct city business

Do you support increasing the use of cycling and walking to conduct city business and to access city programs and services?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: the idea about parking enforcement officers is excellent. Why do they need to drive cars around downtown on their duties? They could just as easily ride bikes, and they would not have to park illegally themselves while ticketing illegally parked cars.
Bike racks at city hall for instance have been unchanged as long as I can remember. No excuse for not upgrading. European cities are way ahead of us on this one. No excuse.
 

4. Exploring the creation of ‘Clean Air Corridors’ during smog days

Toronto is suffering from an unacceptable number of smog days during which the air is dangerously polluted, and Toronto Public Health reports that motorized transportation sources are a major local source of air pollution. Cities around the world have started to experiment with closing streets to motorized traffic on days when their air quality deteriorates. The City of Toronto should begin a study of the feasibility and potential positive health impact of instituting "clean air corridors" in Toronto on smog days, streets where motorized vehicles are restricted in order to provide citizens with travel routes where the air is cleaner and safer to breathe.
More Info: T-CAT Platform: Protect - Explore ‘Creation of Clean Air Corridors’

Do you support directing Toronto Public Health and Transportation Services to investigate the health benefits and potential routes for clean air corridors?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: I don’t believe this would do any good. The bad air will get blown into the “clean air corridors”. I would support it if it can be shown to work.
 

Walking

5. Developing the Pedestrian Master Plan

The city of Toronto has embarked a Pedestrian Master Plan to be developed by 2008. Ideally, this plan should address the pedestrian-related work of all city departments, and provide an ambitious, groundbreaking and detailed blueprint for creating a city that is a joy to walk in throughout its length and breadth.
More info: TCAT platform – Lead – “Pedestrian Plan”

Do you support the development of a Pedestrian Master Plan for the City of Toronto?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: this is a bit too bureaucratic for my tastes. I don’t understand the point of it.
 

6. Coordinating pedestrian issues across divisions

Pedestrians are affected by and affect the work of almost all branches of the city government: Transportation, Planning, Parks and Forestry, Health, Licensing and Standards, Police Services, the TTC, social housing, culture, and tourism. Yet there currently exists no mechanism for coordinating the pedestrian-related work of these various divisions, which means that moving forward any kind of complex pedestrian initiative is very difficult. The city needs to establish a strong sys-tem for coordinating and leading pedestrian initiatives across city divisions.
More info: TCAT platform – Lead – “Pedestrian Plan”

Do you support the creation of a mechanism for coordinating pedestrian issues across City divisions?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: why do pedestrians need a special plan? I don’t understand the point of it. It seems like an excuse to spend a lot of money on a bureaucratic exercise with questionable benefits. I don’t understand what is complex about being a pedestrian.
 

7. Establishing and enforcing pedestrian clearways

Sidewalks are often blocked by a wide variety of obstacles that impede pedestrians. Often, these obstacles are placed in such a way that, between them, they leave little space for pedestrians to pass. These obstacles can include A-frame advertising boards, street patios, transit shelters and other street furniture. Such blockages are in contravention of the city’s accessibility guidelines, and often in contravention of bylaws, which are not enforced. The Harbord Village Resident’s Association has proposed a “clearway” concept where street furniture would be placed in such a way to allow an accessible, clear passage for pedestrians, and that bylaws governing sidewalk obstacles would be systematically enforced.
More info: TCAT Platform – Protect – “Improve bylaw enforcement”

Do you support the establishment of “clearways” for pedestrians on sidewalks?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: this is pretty obvious. Why doesn’t the city enforce their own bylaws? Street furniture and advertising boards are operated by private companies – if they don’t comply they should be charged the costs of remediation.
I don’t understand why the residents can’t just phone their councillor and have the situation corrected. This is a consequence of poor governance through the Megacity concept.
 

8. Improving pedestrian crosswalks

The city has developed a Crosswalk Improvement Program to make crosswalks on major and minor arterial roads safer, and convert dangerous ones into traffic signals. The combined cost of major and minor arterials will be $10.2 million dollars over four years.
More info: City of Toronto – Pedestrian Crossover Review Proposal (Major Arterials) (PDF) and City of Toronto – Pedestrian Crossover Review (Minor Arterials) (PDF)

Do you support the completion of the Crosswalk Improvement Program within four years?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: this is a basic safety issue. Also part of issue in too much vehicle traffic distracting motorists. Amount of money involved is not significant on city-wide basis (vs $800 million for police)
 

9. Maintaining sidewalks to an adequate standard

Sidewalk maintenance in Toronto has fallen far behind schedule because of budget cuts. Crumbling sidewalks are not just an issue of aesthetics – they reduce accessibility, are a danger to public health, and discourage walking as a form of transportation. The city needs to direct the necessary budgetary resources to sidewalk maintenance to get it back on a reasonable schedule.
More info: TCAT Platform – Integrate – “Improve maintenance”

Do you support directing additional budgetary resources to eliminate the backlog in sidewalk maintenance?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: well, sidewalks, roads; this is a consequence of Megacity and downloading. Residents pay sufficient taxes to ALL levels of government (municipal, provincial, federal) that it is completely inexcusable for this situation to occur and it is absolutely and completely unacceptable.
 

10. Increasing the funding of the Civic Improvement Program

The Civic Improvement Program, managed by the Urban Design Group of Planning, makes significant and visible improvements to the pedestrian environment by expanding, designing and beautifying public spaces. Unfortunately, because its funding is limited, it can only work on a fraction of the potential projects it identifies. If the city is to achieve its goal of becoming a beautiful city that draws pedestrians onto its streets, the work of the Civic Improvement Program must be greatly expanded. TCAT recommends increasing the budget by $400,000 a year over four years, allowing the program to work on two additional projects a year.
More info: City of Toronto – Civic Improvement Program

Do you support increasing the budget of the Civic Improvement Program by $400,000 a year over four years?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: I think this should be decided locally which projects should be funded. The amount of money is not significant city-wide.
 

11. Increasing pedestrian unit staffing

The Transportation Division currently only devotes one full-time staff position and half of a managerial position to pedestrians. As a result, those pedestrian initiatives that the city begins are often delayed for years in their execution because of a lack of available staff time and expertise. If Toronto is to make walking an essential part of its transportation policy, as indicated in the official plan and envisaged in the Pedestrian Plan project, then it must provide the requisite staff resources.
More info: TCAT platform – Build – “Increase staff resources”

Do you support increasing the number of full-time staff positions dedicated to pedestrian projects?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: what does this full-time staff person do? I didn’t know that there was a full-time staff doing this.
 

Cycling

12. Streamlining the Bike Lane Approval Process

One of the issues holding up the construction of the Bikeway Network is the lack of an effective bike lane approval process. In 2005 only 1 km of bike lane was built even thought 16 km were proposed. In 2006 only 6 km of the 30 km of funded projects were approved. Councillor support is crucial to ensure bike lanes are built in the year that they are proposed for construction by city staff. Councillors need to expedite the bike lane approval process by consulting with all stakeholders in a timely manner and still ensuring bike lanes go through the Council approvals without delay.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Integrate - Bike lane approval process

Do you support a new streamlined bike lane approval process that will ensure bike lanes are constructed in the year proposed for their implementation by city staff?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: I don’t believe that individual councillors should have the power to deny bike lanes. This means that regressives like Case Ootes can block a bike lane that has a city-wide benefit. In other words, an overall bike plan would be approved (for the entire City) and allocation made from the budget for it, then the work would proceed independent whether the local councillor likes it or not.
 

13. Building links between cycling and transit

Active transportation is crucial link in any public transit system. If people can't comfortably and safely walk or cycle to the bus or subway they won't take public transit. Combining cycling and transit can increase ridership by making transit more accessible and effective for people giving them door-to-door convenience. This can be done by funding the expansion of the bus bike rack project to all TTC routes by 2010, installing a full Bike Station that includes supervised bike parking and change facilities at Union Station as part of its reconstruction and by providing enhanced bike parking such as bike lockers or bike stations at all TTC subway stations and transit hubs by 2010.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Build links between cycling and transit

Do you support funding the following programs to build links between cycling and transit?

  • Funding the expansion of the bus bike rack project to all TTC routes by 2010
  • Providing enhanced Bike Parking or Bike Stations at all TTC subway stations and transit hubs by 2010
  • Installing a full Bike Station that includes supervised bike parking, change facilities and other services at Union Station as part of its reconstruction.

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: I haven’t seen very much usage of the bus bike racks. I guess some people will use them but my experience is that people who bike are independent and wouldn’t take the bus unless desperate. To me this seems like treating bicycling as not a serious alternative because if you get tired of it you can always take the bus; the bus is a serious method of transportation.
Bike stations at all subway stations – this is a very good idea, I think that this is what is done in European cities. I would strongly support this initiative. You could save some money towards it by scrapping the bus bike racks.
 

14. Improving road maintenance in curb lanes and bike lanes

Cycling is a year-round mode of transportation. The hazards that cyclists face on the road vary according to the season. In the spring potholes in the road make navigating bike lanes and the curb lane tricky, in the summer and fall it is dirt and debris that accumulate along the curb, in the winter snow piles up in the bike lanes. The City of Toronto needs to give priority to routine maintenance in the bike lanes and curb lanes of the road where cyclists ride.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Integrate - Improve Maintenance

Do you support prioritizing routine maintenance in high volume cycling corridors such as road patching, street cleaning and snow removal from bike lanes?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: “In the spring potholes…” - oh come on, you wish!! The potholes are a YEAR-ROUND phenomenon. They don’t just make cycling “tricky”; they make it downright DANGEROUS as you must simultaneously dodge traffic while avoiding the monster potholes that will take out your tire (& maybe your manhood, too!).
As for piling up snow in curb / bike lanes – I have given up on this one. A lot of the time you are better just riding in the traffic and take your chances there.
 

15. Promoting cycling as safe, sustainable transportation.

The Toronto Bike Plan in 2001 recommended several new programs to promote cycling and provide cycling education and safety programs to cyclists. However, City Council has not yet increased the budget for these programs. The Toronto Bike Plan 3 year Implementation Strategy report (2005) stated that a doubling of staff was needed to implement the programs recommended. To do this would require adding $270,000 to the Planning Division’s cycling programs budget.
More Info: T-CAT Platform: Promote - Increase funding for cycling safety, education and promotion programs

Do you support doubling the funding for the Cycling Safety Education and Promotion programs offered by the City of Toronto by adding $270,000 to that budget?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: well, it is a 2001 plan and now it is 2006 and the City Council approves tens (hundreds) of millions for the Front St. Extension, Dufferin Jog straightening, St. Clair right-of-way fiasco, and won’t give $270,000 to cyclists. That tells you right there where their priorities lie. Money talks, bullshit walks.
 

16. Implementing the recommendations of the Regional Coroner’s Report on Cycling Fatalities in Toronto (1998)

In 1988 the Regional Coroner published a report on Cycling Fatalities in Toronto. It made a number of recommendations to improve the safety of cyclists most of which have yet to be implemented. Some of these require the cooperation of the Federal and Provincial governments but others are under the jurisdiction of the City. The Mayor and Councillors need to ensure that the city implements these recommendations. They also need to demand that the province and federal governments follow up on the recommendations that apply to them.
More Info: T-CAT Platform: Protect - Implement recommendations of Coroner’s Report

Do you support implementing the recommendations of the Regional Coroner’s Report on Cycling Fatalities in Toronto (1998) that apply to the City of Toronto and working with the Provincial and Federal Governments to ensure that they do the same?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: when was this report published? 1998? It is now 2006! By the way, wasn’t 1998 the year Megacity was forced down our throats? Just asking.
 

17. Increasing funding to build the Bikeway Network

Construction of the Bikeway network has lagged well behind the schedule set out in the Toronto Bike Plan. Part of the reason is that capital funding has been less than half of what was recommended in the Bike Plan. The Toronto Bike Plan 3 Year Implementation Strategy that was presented to Works Committee in August 2005 sets out a budget plan to get the Bikeway Network construction back on track. To see the bike plan implemented Council needs to approve these budget amounts and ensure that the requisite staff are in place to work on implementing these projects.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Build the Bikeway Network

Do you support adding 285 kilometers to the Bikeway Network by 2010 by supporting the budgets outlined below?

YesNoNo
Answer
 Transportation ServicesParks Forestry and Recreation
YearkmCycling Infrastructure (millions) kmBikeway Network Expansion Trails and Pathways State of Good Repair Bikeway Network** PF&R Total (millions)
200735$6.0*8$845,000$655,000$1.50
200860$6.2*8$895,000$655,000$1.55
200968$7.89$990,000$610,000$1.60
201072$9.210$810,000$790,000$1.65
*Toronto Bike Plan - 3 year implementation Strategy (2005) recommendation
**State of Good Repair trail upgrades
Comments:
 

18. Increasing staffing to build the Bikeway Network

The Toronto Bike Plan recommends increasing the level of funding available for building cycling infrastructure. This will require a corresponding increase in the level of staff time to plan, design and implement these projects. Part of the reason that there has been a backlog of bike lane projects is the shortage of staff to work on them. To get these projects back on track the City of Toronto needs to dedicate more staff to building the Bikeway Network.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Build - Increase staffing

Do you support increasing the number of staff working on planning designing and implementing cycling infrastructure by:

  • adding 4 staff to the Transportation Services division to work on cycling infrastructure.
  • adding a senior position of Cycling and Pathways Planner to the Parks Forestry and Recreation Division

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: why not? I don’t think this is the priority of City Council. They prefer to spend time & resources on real issues such as automobile traffic. [sarcasm].
 

19. Cycling infrastructure projects in Ward 18

Active Transportation requires a network of bike lanes and paths that span the city. To enable this to happen each Councillor needs to support the projects proposed for their ward, and work to ensure they are approved and built in the year that they have been proposed for construction by city staff. Transportation Services staff have proposed projects for 2006, 2007 and 2008. Projects for 2009 and 2010 have not been determined yet. They will be selected from the list of projects marked TBD(to be determined). Each of the bike lane projects will have to go through a bike lane approval process that includes consultation with the community.
More info: TCAT - Ward 18 Information

The bike lane projects proposed for your ward are listed below. Do you support the following projects? (Indicate by typing ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ into the support box for each project.)

Support
Yes/No
StreetFromToTypekmYear
YESLappin & HallamLandsdownDovercourtBike Lane1.22005
YESLansdown Ave.DavenportBloorBike Lane1.52005
YESDupontDundasLandsdowneBike Lane12007
YESBloor*CP PS Lead railpathDovercourtBike Lane1.7TBD
Comment: See my response to No. 12; I don’t understand why the councillor should have the right to say yea or nay to these projects. By the way, even although our local councillor is the bike chair, I hadn’t even heard of any of these projects before now.
 
Candidate Lists
Mayoral Candidates:All   Survey Complete
Council Candidates by Ward (Numerical):All   Survey Complete
Council Candidates by Ward (Alpha):All
Mayoral and CouncilAll
School Trustee Candidates by School Board and Ward:All   Survey Complete


Not logged in  log in
bikeToronto - Latest Toronto Cycling News Toronto Coalition for Active Transportation Toronto Coalition for Active Transportation