TCAT Election Survey Logo 
Ward 33 - Don Valley East Candidates

Survey Posted:
Zane Caplan
Shelley Carroll
Anderson Tung


Not Returned:
Jim Conlon
Sarah Tsang-Fahey


Not Sent:

Other Wards

Candidate: Shelley Carroll ('Incumbent')
Office: councillor
Ward: 33 - Don Valley East
Campaign Phone: 416-491-9955
Website: www.shelleycarroll.ca
Email: shelley@shelleycarroll.ca
View this candidate's 2003 Survey

Survey Results

Active Transportation

1. Increasing the role of walking and cycling in Toronto

Walking and cycling (Active Transportation) are the most affordable, healthy and sustainable forms of transportation. In order to seriously tackle the problems of smog, local greenhouse gas emissions, increasing traffic congestion and volatile gas prices, Toronto City Council needs to actively support programs and infrastructure changes that encourage walking and cycling.

Do you support increasing the role of walking and cycling in Toronto’s transportation system through improved programs and infrastructure?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: Absolutely. Toronto’s Bike Plan offers a clear vision, but Council has not driven it forward. We need to stop debating whether or not to have bike lanes. These decisions have already been made. It’s time to start discussing how to best implement bike lanes where they are most needed.
 

2. Integrating cycling and pedestrian issues into city planning: road reconstruction & resurfacing

The most cost effective way of building bike lanes and adding pedestrian friendly features to roads is to do it when roads are reconstructed or resurfaced. Toronto spends millions of dollars every year reconstructing and resurfacing roads and most of these are done without making changes to the cycling and pedestrian environment. This is a missed opportunity. Every road reconstruction and resurfacing project and new road construction should incorporate design features that will improve conditions for cyclists and pedestrians.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Integrate - Road Reconstruction

Do you support a new process that will review road reconstruction and resurfacing projects, as well as development plans, to ensure that they include improvements to the active transportation infrastructure?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: We need to integrate bike planning into our formal planning structures, and I would support looking at ways to do this through new policies at the City. Currently, community group consideration of development applications is too narrowly focused to include bike planning.
 

3. Increasing the use of cycling and walking to conduct city business

As the City of Toronto calls on its residents to make the transition to Active Transportation it should lead by example by incorporating cycling and walking into the delivery of its services. It could do this by: a) having more staff use bikes in the course of their duties such as bylaw officers, parking enforcement officers, police and other city employees b) using more bicycle and foot couriers c) improving bicycle parking facilities at city buildings to encourage staff to bike to work and residents to bike to access city programs and services.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Lead - Increase the use of cycling and walking to conduct city business

Do you support increasing the use of cycling and walking to conduct city business and to access city programs and services?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: The City of Toronto has made good progress in the last term of Council in this area. I was proud to help launch the TRIP program, which promotes the use of alternative forms of transportation to City employees at North York Civic Centre. We also installed new bike lockers behind Nathan Phillips Square. Police officers on bikes are clearly a successful idea, and we should look at ways to put more staff on two wheels wherever possible.
In addition, we could look at modifying our RFP for delivery services to allow them to differentiate between short trips and long trips – this could help bike/transit/pedestrian delivery services to qualify for delivery contracts with the City.
 

4. Exploring the creation of ‘Clean Air Corridors’ during smog days

Toronto is suffering from an unacceptable number of smog days during which the air is dangerously polluted, and Toronto Public Health reports that motorized transportation sources are a major local source of air pollution. Cities around the world have started to experiment with closing streets to motorized traffic on days when their air quality deteriorates. The City of Toronto should begin a study of the feasibility and potential positive health impact of instituting "clean air corridors" in Toronto on smog days, streets where motorized vehicles are restricted in order to provide citizens with travel routes where the air is cleaner and safer to breathe.
More Info: T-CAT Platform: Protect - Explore ‘Creation of Clean Air Corridors’

Do you support directing Toronto Public Health and Transportation Services to investigate the health benefits and potential routes for clean air corridors?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: While clean air corridors would keep a bad air quality day from getting worse, and I would support research in this area, what we really need is systemic improvements to our bike network, our transit network, and programs that promote the reduced overall use of the car. That will reduce smog, and improve air quality.
 

Walking

5. Developing the Pedestrian Master Plan

The city of Toronto has embarked a Pedestrian Master Plan to be developed by 2008. Ideally, this plan should address the pedestrian-related work of all city departments, and provide an ambitious, groundbreaking and detailed blueprint for creating a city that is a joy to walk in throughout its length and breadth.
More info: TCAT platform – Lead – “Pedestrian Plan”

Do you support the development of a Pedestrian Master Plan for the City of Toronto?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: Yes. During this term of Council, there have been many improvements to pedestrian infrastructure. We approved new zebra crossing standards and approved funding to enhance safety at over 200 pedestrian crossings. Toronto was also selected to host the International Walk 21 pedestrian conference in 2007. I personally moved that the General Manager of Transportation should attend this year’s conference along with Dan Egan in order to begin balancing road infrastructure needs with pedestrian needs. A Pedestrian Master Plan is needed as a guide to developing our pedestrian infrastructure.
 

6. Coordinating pedestrian issues across divisions

Pedestrians are affected by and affect the work of almost all branches of the city government: Transportation, Planning, Parks and Forestry, Health, Licensing and Standards, Police Services, the TTC, social housing, culture, and tourism. Yet there currently exists no mechanism for coordinating the pedestrian-related work of these various divisions, which means that moving forward any kind of complex pedestrian initiative is very difficult. The city needs to establish a strong sys-tem for coordinating and leading pedestrian initiatives across city divisions.
More info: TCAT platform – Lead – “Pedestrian Plan”

Do you support the creation of a mechanism for coordinating pedestrian issues across City divisions?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: Toronto’s new governance structure, implemented during this term of Council, offers much better co-ordination and efficiency. The City’s bureaucracy now interact in a much more effective way and we have already seen examples of strong co-operation, such as the Finch Ave. reconstruction, which could have taken over a year to complete under the old system, but instead took only 3 months. I would strongly support additional ways for our departments to work together.
 

7. Establishing and enforcing pedestrian clearways

Sidewalks are often blocked by a wide variety of obstacles that impede pedestrians. Often, these obstacles are placed in such a way that, between them, they leave little space for pedestrians to pass. These obstacles can include A-frame advertising boards, street patios, transit shelters and other street furniture. Such blockages are in contravention of the city’s accessibility guidelines, and often in contravention of bylaws, which are not enforced. The Harbord Village Resident’s Association has proposed a “clearway” concept where street furniture would be placed in such a way to allow an accessible, clear passage for pedestrians, and that bylaws governing sidewalk obstacles would be systematically enforced.
More info: TCAT Platform – Protect – “Improve bylaw enforcement”

Do you support the establishment of “clearways” for pedestrians on sidewalks?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: As part of Toronto’s Street Furniture program, and in my role as Works Committee Chair, I asked staff to develop a series of guidelines for placement of street furniture. These guidelines were approved by Council as part of the RFP process, and will help ensure clear paths for pedestrians, and safe sightlines for cyclists, transit drivers, and cars. I believe this must be a core component of our plan.
 

8. Improving pedestrian crosswalks

The city has developed a Crosswalk Improvement Program to make crosswalks on major and minor arterial roads safer, and convert dangerous ones into traffic signals. The combined cost of major and minor arterials will be $10.2 million dollars over four years.
More info: City of Toronto – Pedestrian Crossover Review Proposal (Major Arterials) (PDF) and City of Toronto – Pedestrian Crossover Review (Minor Arterials) (PDF)

Do you support the completion of the Crosswalk Improvement Program within four years?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: As Works Chair, I strongly supported these improvements.
 

9. Maintaining sidewalks to an adequate standard

Sidewalk maintenance in Toronto has fallen far behind schedule because of budget cuts. Crumbling sidewalks are not just an issue of aesthetics – they reduce accessibility, are a danger to public health, and discourage walking as a form of transportation. The city needs to direct the necessary budgetary resources to sidewalk maintenance to get it back on a reasonable schedule.
More info: TCAT Platform – Integrate – “Improve maintenance”

Do you support directing additional budgetary resources to eliminate the backlog in sidewalk maintenance?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: I support additional expenditures to improve sidewalk maintenance, but I also support the current review of pavement degradation fees – designed to charge companies that make the cuts for the damage they do to our public infrastructure. This would make a vast improvement to sidewalk repair investment. The public should not have to pay for the costs of utilities’ impact on our sidewalks.
 

10. Increasing the funding of the Civic Improvement Program

The Civic Improvement Program, managed by the Urban Design Group of Planning, makes significant and visible improvements to the pedestrian environment by expanding, designing and beautifying public spaces. Unfortunately, because its funding is limited, it can only work on a fraction of the potential projects it identifies. If the city is to achieve its goal of becoming a beautiful city that draws pedestrians onto its streets, the work of the Civic Improvement Program must be greatly expanded. TCAT recommends increasing the budget by $400,000 a year over four years, allowing the program to work on two additional projects a year.
More info: City of Toronto – Civic Improvement Program

Do you support increasing the budget of the Civic Improvement Program by $400,000 a year over four years?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: I strongly support this initiative. I also look forward to reviewing the program thus far. I believe this initiative could be maximized if we review the current process.
 

11. Increasing pedestrian unit staffing

The Transportation Division currently only devotes one full-time staff position and half of a managerial position to pedestrians. As a result, those pedestrian initiatives that the city begins are often delayed for years in their execution because of a lack of available staff time and expertise. If Toronto is to make walking an essential part of its transportation policy, as indicated in the official plan and envisaged in the Pedestrian Plan project, then it must provide the requisite staff resources.
More info: TCAT platform – Build – “Increase staff resources”

Do you support increasing the number of full-time staff positions dedicated to pedestrian projects?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: Not only staffing but policy prioritization will help here. Senior staff need to put every transportation report through pedestrian and cycling ‘Filters’, in their own minds, before signing the reports.
 

Cycling

12. Streamlining the Bike Lane Approval Process

One of the issues holding up the construction of the Bikeway Network is the lack of an effective bike lane approval process. In 2005 only 1 km of bike lane was built even thought 16 km were proposed. In 2006 only 6 km of the 30 km of funded projects were approved. Councillor support is crucial to ensure bike lanes are built in the year that they are proposed for construction by city staff. Councillors need to expedite the bike lane approval process by consulting with all stakeholders in a timely manner and still ensuring bike lanes go through the Council approvals without delay.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Integrate - Bike lane approval process

Do you support a new streamlined bike lane approval process that will ensure bike lanes are constructed in the year proposed for their implementation by city staff?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: Council needs to get serious about implementing the Bike Plan. We need to stop debating whether or not to implement bike lanes, and start discussing how to make them happen.
 

13. Building links between cycling and transit

Active transportation is crucial link in any public transit system. If people can't comfortably and safely walk or cycle to the bus or subway they won't take public transit. Combining cycling and transit can increase ridership by making transit more accessible and effective for people giving them door-to-door convenience. This can be done by funding the expansion of the bus bike rack project to all TTC routes by 2010, installing a full Bike Station that includes supervised bike parking and change facilities at Union Station as part of its reconstruction and by providing enhanced bike parking such as bike lockers or bike stations at all TTC subway stations and transit hubs by 2010.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Build links between cycling and transit

Do you support funding the following programs to build links between cycling and transit?

  • Funding the expansion of the bus bike rack project to all TTC routes by 2010
  • Providing enhanced Bike Parking or Bike Stations at all TTC subway stations and transit hubs by 2010
  • Installing a full Bike Station that includes supervised bike parking, change facilities and other services at Union Station as part of its reconstruction.

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: These are all initiatives that could change the face of suburban transit ridership although few transit activists may be aware of them. It is in the inner suburbs that residents are often a 20 to 30 minute walk away from their main bus connection. If you build the infrastructure, they will get bikes in gear.
 

14. Improving road maintenance in curb lanes and bike lanes

Cycling is a year-round mode of transportation. The hazards that cyclists face on the road vary according to the season. In the spring potholes in the road make navigating bike lanes and the curb lane tricky, in the summer and fall it is dirt and debris that accumulate along the curb, in the winter snow piles up in the bike lanes. The City of Toronto needs to give priority to routine maintenance in the bike lanes and curb lanes of the road where cyclists ride.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Integrate - Improve Maintenance

Do you support prioritizing routine maintenance in high volume cycling corridors such as road patching, street cleaning and snow removal from bike lanes?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: While I support an aggressive maintenance program, I think we have to address the backlog of repairing utility cut patches as a whole and then cyclists will see an improvement.
 

15. Promoting cycling as safe, sustainable transportation.

The Toronto Bike Plan in 2001 recommended several new programs to promote cycling and provide cycling education and safety programs to cyclists. However, City Council has not yet increased the budget for these programs. The Toronto Bike Plan 3 year Implementation Strategy report (2005) stated that a doubling of staff was needed to implement the programs recommended. To do this would require adding $270,000 to the Planning Division’s cycling programs budget.
More Info: T-CAT Platform: Promote - Increase funding for cycling safety, education and promotion programs

Do you support doubling the funding for the Cycling Safety Education and Promotion programs offered by the City of Toronto by adding $270,000 to that budget?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: I would want to review how this program is executed before adding it to the budget. We have had great success in other transportation safety education programs this year, simply by moving to a younger, more cutting edge supplier.
 

16. Implementing the recommendations of the Regional Coroner’s Report on Cycling Fatalities in Toronto (1998)

In 1988 the Regional Coroner published a report on Cycling Fatalities in Toronto. It made a number of recommendations to improve the safety of cyclists most of which have yet to be implemented. Some of these require the cooperation of the Federal and Provincial governments but others are under the jurisdiction of the City. The Mayor and Councillors need to ensure that the city implements these recommendations. They also need to demand that the province and federal governments follow up on the recommendations that apply to them.
More Info: T-CAT Platform: Protect - Implement recommendations of Coroner’s Report

Do you support implementing the recommendations of the Regional Coroner’s Report on Cycling Fatalities in Toronto (1998) that apply to the City of Toronto and working with the Provincial and Federal Governments to ensure that they do the same?

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: I believe that a multi-disciplinary team should be defined as an inter-governmental team in order to truly move forward on the recommendations of the report. We should get beyond writing a letter asking other orders of government to act and ask that they sit down with us and co-ordinate implementation.
 

17. Increasing funding to build the Bikeway Network

Construction of the Bikeway network has lagged well behind the schedule set out in the Toronto Bike Plan. Part of the reason is that capital funding has been less than half of what was recommended in the Bike Plan. The Toronto Bike Plan 3 Year Implementation Strategy that was presented to Works Committee in August 2005 sets out a budget plan to get the Bikeway Network construction back on track. To see the bike plan implemented Council needs to approve these budget amounts and ensure that the requisite staff are in place to work on implementing these projects.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Build the Bikeway Network

Do you support adding 285 kilometers to the Bikeway Network by 2010 by supporting the budgets outlined below?

YesNoNo
Answer
 Transportation ServicesParks Forestry and Recreation
YearkmCycling Infrastructure (millions) kmBikeway Network Expansion Trails and Pathways State of Good Repair Bikeway Network** PF&R Total (millions)
200735$6.0*8$845,000$655,000$1.50
200860$6.2*8$895,000$655,000$1.55
200968$7.89$990,000$610,000$1.60
201072$9.210$810,000$790,000$1.65
*Toronto Bike Plan - 3 year implementation Strategy (2005) recommendation
**State of Good Repair trail upgrades
Comments:
 

18. Increasing staffing to build the Bikeway Network

The Toronto Bike Plan recommends increasing the level of funding available for building cycling infrastructure. This will require a corresponding increase in the level of staff time to plan, design and implement these projects. Part of the reason that there has been a backlog of bike lane projects is the shortage of staff to work on them. To get these projects back on track the City of Toronto needs to dedicate more staff to building the Bikeway Network.
More info: T-CAT Platform: Build - Increase staffing

Do you support increasing the number of staff working on planning designing and implementing cycling infrastructure by:

  • adding 4 staff to the Transportation Services division to work on cycling infrastructure.
  • adding a senior position of Cycling and Pathways Planner to the Parks Forestry and Recreation Division

Strongly
Support
Somewhat
Support
Somewhat
Oppose
Strongly
Oppose
No
Answer
Comments: Yes, and they must seek out local councillors’ support more enthusiastically. These are political gains for councillors once the idea is truly on their radar.
 

19. Cycling infrastructure projects in Ward 33

Active Transportation requires a network of bike lanes and paths that span the city. To enable this to happen each Councillor needs to support the projects proposed for their ward, and work to ensure they are approved and built in the year that they have been proposed for construction by city staff. Transportation Services staff have proposed projects for 2006, 2007 and 2008. Projects for 2009 and 2010 have not been determined yet. They will be selected from the list of projects marked TBD(to be determined). Each of the bike lane projects will have to go through a bike lane approval process that includes consultation with the community.
More info: TCAT - Ward 33 Information

The bike lane projects proposed for your ward are listed below. Do you support the following projects? (Indicate by typing ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ into the support box for each project.)

Support
Yes/No
StreetFromToTypekmYear
YESVan HorneDon Mills404Bike Lane1.12008
YESFinch Hydro CorridorFinch Hydro Corridor404 CrossingCrossing0.12009†
YESFinch Hydro Corridor404Victoria ParkCorridor Path0.72009†
YESDon MillsParkway Forest401Bike Lane0.3TBD
YESBrianSheppardOld SheppardBike Lane0.4TBD
YESSheppardParkway ForestBrianBoulevard Path1TBD
Comment:
 
Candidate Lists
Mayoral Candidates:All   Survey Complete
Council Candidates by Ward (Numerical):All   Survey Complete
Council Candidates by Ward (Alpha):All
Mayoral and CouncilAll
School Trustee Candidates by School Board and Ward:All   Survey Complete


Not logged in  log in
bikeToronto - Latest Toronto Cycling News Toronto Coalition for Active Transportation Toronto Coalition for Active Transportation